Skip to content

JOBUZO

  • News
  • Indonesia
  • Toggle search form
Jury rules against Meta and YouTube in social media addiction case

Jury rules against Meta and YouTube in social media addiction case

Posted on 25 March 2026 By jobuzo

A jury in Los Angeles has found that Meta and YouTube were negligent in a closely-watched trial over social media addiction. The companies were ordered to pay $6 million in damages to the woman who said she was harmed by their addictive features as a child.

The case was brought by a 20-year-old woman, named in court documents as “K.G.M,” who sued Meta, YouTube, TikTok and Snap, saying that she had been harmed by the platforms as a child due to addictive features. TikTok and Snap reached a settlement ahead of the trial.

According to NBC News, Meta was ordered to pay 70 percent of the $3 million in compensatory damages with YouTube taking on the remaining portion. The jury awarded an additional $3 million in punitive damages. “We respectfully disagree with the verdict and are evaluating our legal options,” a Meta spokesperson said in a statement. “We disagree with the verdict and plan to appeal.,” Google spokesperson José Castañeda said in a statement. “This case misunderstands YouTube, which is a responsibly built streaming platform, not a social media site.”

Advertisement

Advertisement

The weeks-long trial has been closely watched because it’s the first of many court cases in which plaintiffs have argued that social media platforms harmed minors due to how they were designed. Meta’s lawyers and executives have disputed the idea that social media should be considered an “addiction.” CEO Mark Zuckerberg testified that the company wants Instagram to be “useful,” and repeatedly accused the plaintiff’s lawyer of “mischaracterizing” his past statements.

News :<div>12 weeks' jail for school IT support technician who took upskirt videos of teachers</div>

“This is the first time in history a jury has heard testimony by executives and seen internal documents that we believe prove these companies chose profits over children,” Joseph VanZandt, one of K.G.M.’s lawyers, said in a statement to The New York Times,

For Meta, it’s the second legal setback in as many days. The verdict comes one day after a jury in New Mexico ruled against Meta in a trial over child safety issues. The company was ordered to pay $375 million in penalties; the company said it would appeal.

Update, March 25, 2026, 11:22AM PT: Added a statement from Google.

Update. March 25, 2026, 2:05PM PT: Added details about punitive damages.

Jury rules against Meta and YouTube in social media addiction case


News

Post navigation

Previous Post: The AI skills gap is here, says AI company, and power users are pulling ahead
Next Post: PSA: T-Mobile customers have a week to sign up for a free year of MLB.TV

Related Posts

What’s behind the massive AI data center headlines? What’s behind the massive AI data center headlines? News
Kevin Rose’s simple test for AI hardware — would you want to punch someone in the face who’s wearing it? Kevin Rose’s simple test for AI hardware — would you want to punch someone in the face who’s wearing it? News
Afghanistan's Taliban accuses Pakistan of killing 9 children in air strike on Khost Afghanistan’s Taliban accuses Pakistan of killing 9 children in air strike on Khost News

Latest

  • Alec Baldwin Shares Important Message He’s Instilling in 8 Children 
  • The AI layoff wave is becoming a powder keg
  • Orbio raises $21 million to automate hiring and onboarding for frontline workers
  • Protest staged in Geneva against upcoming G7 summit
  • Alibaba and JD.com targeted in smear campaign ahead of shopping festival
  • Israel’s strike in Beirut triggers Iranian warnings of retaliation, casting shadow over emerging U.S.-Iran deal
  • EU climate monitor reports second-warmest May globally
  • New York Knicks complete comeback to win first NBA title in 53 years
  • UK court to rule on ban of pro-Palestinian group
  • The Congresswoman Who Knows Exactly How to Go Viral

Copyright © 2025 JOBUZO. Disclaimers | Privacy Policies

Powered by PressBook Masonry Blogs