Donald Trump’s assault on science could threaten the United States’ position as the world’s leading research nation and have knock-on effects worldwide, Nobel Prize officials in Sweden told AFP.
Since taking office in January, the U.S. president has cut billions of dollars in funding, attacked universities’ academic freedoms and overseen mass layoffs of scientists across federal agencies.
Next week, the Nobel Prizes will be announced in Stockholm and Oslo, and chances are high that researchers working in the United States will take home some of the prestigious awards.
The United States is home to more Nobel science laureates than any other country, due largely to its longstanding investment in basic science and academic freedoms.
But that could change, said Hans Ellegren, secretary general of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, which awards the Nobel prizes in physics, chemistry, and economics.
“In the post-war period, the U.S. has taken over Germany’s role as the world’s leading scientific nation. When they now start cutting research funding, it threatens the country’s position,” he told AFP.
Since January, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) have terminated 2,100 research grants totaling around $9.5 billion and $2.6 billion in contracts, according to an independent database called Grant Watch.
Affected projects include studies on gender, the health effects of global warming, Alzheimer’s disease and cancer.
Efforts are under way to restore some of the funding but uncertainty looms.
Other fields in Trump’s line of fire include vaccines, climate change and diversity, equity and inclusion.
Thomas Perlmann, secretary general of the committee that awards the Nobel Prize for Medicine, said it was “no coincidence that the US has by far the most Nobel laureates”.
“But there is now a creeping sense of uncertainty about the U.S.’ willingness to maintain their leading position in research,” he said.
Perlmann called the United States “the very engine” of scientific research worldwide.
“There would be very serious consequences for research globally if it starts to falter,” he added. “It doesn’t take very many years of large cutbacks to cause irreversible harm.”
‘China on the rise’
Trump’s cuts could lead to a brain drain and ripple effects on research in other countries, Ellegren and Perlmann said.
Scientists and researchers who have already lost their jobs or funding may not return to their fields even if budgets are restored, and younger would-be scientists may decide not to pursue a career in research, they said.
“There is a risk that a whole generation of young researchers will be lost,” Ellegren warned.
While Trump’s policies primarily affect U.S. research, international cooperation is already suffering as a result, he said.
The NIH finance collaborations in other countries, “and that has become more difficult under the new administration”.
“Any nationalist or chauvinistically inclined regulation of academic activity hampers the global exchange of ideas and data,” Ellegren stressed. “Research is by nature global. Researchers have always exchanged knowledge and experiences.”
Some countries have tried to attract U.S. scientists, while non-American researchers may be tempted to leave the United States to pursue their work elsewhere.
A U.S. retreat could therefore open the door for other nations to take big strides.
“Research is an important basis for innovation and entrepreneurship. That means it could become easier for other countries to compete with the U.S.,” Ellegren suggested.
“The big global trend right now is that research in China is on the rise,” he said, adding: “They are investing unbelievable resources.”
Perlmann said Trump ought to protect the U.S. legacy.
“You would hope that Trump doesn’t want to give a walkover to China and other countries keen to take over the leader’s jersey.”
If given a chance to talk directly to Trump, Ellegren said he would impress upon him that it was in America’s own interest to maintain academic freedoms and scientific funding.
“I would say that… one of the reasons your country has been so successful is that researchers have been able to seek new knowledge and have good resources.
“The United States has invested a lot in research in the post-war period, both privately and federally. And that is what has helped your country build its prosperity,” he said.
© 2025 AFP
Trump jeopardizing U.S. role as scientific leader: Nobel officials
